FICTIONAL WORKSHOP SOURCE
Client calibration
MT06 | client_shared | 2026-10-27 | S01

Avery: The first view shows plenty of names. What happens if we insist on listed-company experience and group-level finance ownership?

Rowan: We can apply both filters, but the result depends on whether unknown experience is excluded or placed in a follow-up group.

Sam: I want the strict count first, then the count including records that need checking. I do not want the second number described as qualified candidates.

Cameron: Show me what happens if we relax listed-company experience but keep the cash forecasting requirement. That is closer to the business problem.

Avery: And can we compare people within two hours of London?

Rowan: The travel file contains fictional scheduled flight durations only. It does not include ground travel or a promise that a candidate will travel.

Sam: Then label it flight duration and show which routes are missing. Do not turn it into a commuting guarantee.

Cameron: I am also worried that broad titles hide narrow scope. A divisional CFO is not automatically comparable to a group CFO.

Rowan: We have a scope field and evidence links. We can show the difference without ranking people solely on title.

Avery: Please save the two filter states with their counts. That will let us discuss the requirement change instead of remembering different numbers.

Sam: No final criteria approval today. We are using the comparison to decide which assumptions need checking.
